Connecticut Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 9,421
Salim v. United Nations et al
as 3:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Beverly Salim
Defendant:
United Nations and Antonio Guterres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Family Garage Inc et al v. City of Bridgeport et al
as 3:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
Family Garage Inc, Family Towing Inc, Family Motor Pool Inc and others
Defendant:
City of Bridgeport, City of Bridgeport Police Department and Rebeca Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Harris v. Reeves et al
as 3:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Defendant:
Robert S. Reeves, Cathy S. Palmer, Ralph Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wilkens v. City of Stamford et al
as 3:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Samuel Wilkens
Defendant:
City of Stamford, Stamford Police Department, Costello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steele v. Hartford Police Departm et al
as 3:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Q. Steele
Defendant:
Hartford Police Departm and Hartford Superior Court
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
