US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 12,992
Thomas v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02031
Plaintiff:
Derieon Thomas
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Velazquez, J. Frausto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Dart
as 1:2024cv02000
Plaintiff:
Jerome Simpson
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buari v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Yasmin Buari
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv02029
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams and Miles
Defendant:
John Doe, Tom Dart and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Slater et al
as 1:2024cv01968
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Santez Johnson
Defendant:
R. Slater and Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv02025
Plaintiff:
Jermaine M Phelps
Defendant:
Smith, Mount Sterling Correctional Facility and ERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodges v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv01956
Plaintiff:
Richard Hodges
Defendant:
Niccoelle E. Jackson and Tyneer N. Butler-Winters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv01897
Plaintiff:
Wynton P Stewart
Defendant:
Cook County Jail and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. CCC Center of Correctional Concern et al
as 1:2024cv01843
Plaintiff:
Johnathan N Mosley
Defendant:
CCC Center of Correctional Concern, Well Path and Mike Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Kelly et al
as 1:2024cv01846
Plaintiff:
Johnathan N Mosley
Defendant:
Mike Kelly, Well Path, S Hunckler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
