US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases

Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,598
LAMOND v. USA
as 1:2024cv00051
Petitioner: JOHN E. LAMOND, II
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
KIMBROUGH v. USA
as 1:2023cv02291
Petitioner: KERRY KIMBROUGH
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SAWYER v. USA
as 2:2023cv00579
Petitioner: HOWARD J SAWYER
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ROBERTSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02271
Petitioner: FREDDIE ROBERTSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LOMAX v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02272
Petitioner: ANTHONY LOMAX
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LEVELS v. USA
as 3:2023cv00230
Petitioner: REKO D. LEVELS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
NOEL v. USA
as 1:2023cv02222
Petitioner: KEVIN NOEL
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02112
Petitioner: GEOFFRIE ALLEN LEE DILL
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PARSONS v. USA
as 1:2023cv02010
Petitioner: LANCE PARSONS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
COLLIER v. USA
as 3:2023cv00178
Petitioner: THEODIS COLLIER
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?