US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 61 - 70 of 71,074
KENNEDY v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
TYLER JOSEPH KENNEDY
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HARRIS v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00699
Petitioner:
JOHN HARRIS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOVALL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
DANIEL C. STOVALL
Defendant:
VANIHEL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOVALL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
DANIEL C. STOVALL
Defendant:
VANIHEL, BOBBIE RIGGS, BURD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Properties 4 Rent LLC. et al v. Nationwide General Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
Properties 4 Rent LLC. and Futures 22 LLC.
Defendant:
Nationwide General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
BRASWELL v. COLLINS-DENNIS et al
as 1:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
ANDRE V. BRASWELL
Defendant:
ALICIA COLLINS-DENNIS, DEBORAH OATS LIGHTFOOT and TANNIKA LIGHTFOOT PATTON
THOMAS ROEHRMAN V. LEADSMARKET.COM, LLC, MARKETING LABS LLC and NESMETAJU, LLC
as 1:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Thomas Roehrman
Defendant:
Leadsmarket.com, Marketing Labs, LLC and Nesmetaju, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
JONES v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
WARDEN, BENNETT, OFFICERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C., WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, F. VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
