Indiana Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 7,167
AYERS v. CALLAHAN et al
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
JARON AYERS
Defendant:
BLAKE CALLAHAN and TOWN OF CHESTERFIELD, IN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RHODES et al v. JEFFERSON BUILDING COMMISSION et al
as 4:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
GLENN S. RHODES and SHARON YOUNG
Defendant:
JEFFERSON BUILDING COMMISSION, JEFFERSON ENGINEERS OFFICE, MUNICIPALITY AND PUBLIC UTILITIES OF JEFFERSONVILLE INDIANA and others
Taebel v. Indiana State of et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Eric Holcomb and Rokita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Upshaw v. Custer et al
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Radiance Marie Upshaw
Defendant:
Jason Custer, John Bohdan and Lawrence Shine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taebel v. Link
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
John A. Link
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Owens v. South Bend Community School Corporation
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Lester Loviad Owens and Lester L Owens
Defendant:
South Bend Community School Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. MAJESTIC CARE CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
TEDDIE B JONES and TEDDIE JONES
Defendant:
MAJESTIC CARE CENTER, MAJESTIC NURSING HOME, DAVID EARLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SHAW v. JOHNSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA SHAW
Defendant:
JOHNSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL doing business as MILLERS MERRY MANOR and MILLERS HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATSON v. BINFORD
as 1:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
JAMES WATSON
Defendant:
MATTHEW BINFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Felthoff v. Sliger
as 4:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Felthoff
Defendant:
Alex Sliger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
