District Court Cases in Minnesota
Cases 161 - 170 of 84,498
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01735
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Nicasio-Hall v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
as 0:2024cv01745
Plaintiff:
Tamara Nicasio-Hall
Defendant:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Burlett v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 0:2024cv01734
Plaintiff:
Charlene Burlett
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
City of Hollywood Firefighters' Pension Fund v. UnitedHealth Group Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv01743
Plaintiff:
City of Hollywood Firefighters' Pension Fund
Defendant:
UnitedHealth Group Inc., Andrew Witty, Stephen Hemsley and others
L.H. et al v. Best Buy Co., Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv01730
Plaintiff:
L.H. and Shianka Williams
Defendant:
Best Buy Co., Inc. and Midea America Corp.
Jacofsky v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01733
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Jacofsky
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Luecking et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01731
Plaintiff:
William Luecking and Kimberly Luecking
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Seelig v. Ramsey County, Minnesota et al
as 0:2024cv01732
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Seelig
Defendant:
Ramsey County, Minnesota, Inmate Services Corporation, Rogeric Hankins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
