Missouri Real Property Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 83
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP v. Bracht et al
as 4:2020cv01485
Defendant:
0.43 Acres of Real Estate in Audrain County, Missouri, Unknown Owners, Mary L. Bracht, Trustee of the Herbert and Mary Bracht Living Trust Dated April 5, 2016 and others
Plaintiff:
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP v. Hays, Trustee of the Jason & Melissa Hays Trust et al
as 2:2020cv04069
Defendant:
Laclede Gas Company n/k/a Spire Inc., Jason Hays, Trustee of the Jason & Melissa Hays Trust, 0.34 Acres of Real Estate in Moniteau County, Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP v. Klaty, et al
as 4:2020cv00316
Defendant:
0.46 Acres of Real Estate in Henry County, Missouri, Annette Klaty, Trustee of The Keith Klaty Trust Agreement, Keith Klaty, Trustee of The Keith Klaty Trust Agreement and others
Plaintiff:
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 5.84 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2019cv00092
Defendant:
Karen Sue Eggert Inman, Judy J. Worlitz, 1.40 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.57 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2019cv00086
Defendant:
0.34 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 0.57 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, City of West Alton and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.49 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2019cv00085
Defendant:
1.49 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 0.87 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Sara Stahlschmidt and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.98 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01848
Defendant:
Donna Kaufmann and William W. Kaufmann as Trustees of the William W. Kaufmann and Donna Kaufmann Trust Dated May 4, 2017, Karla J. Machens Trust Dated March 10, 1995, 0.60 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 4.25 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01850
Defendant:
2.18 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Portage Des Sioux, City of, 4.25 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 2.28 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis Charles, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01846
Defendant:
American Telephone and Telegraph Company, City of Portage des Sioux, Union Electric Company and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.73 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01691
Defendant:
0.48 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri, 0.06 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri, 0.73 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
