US District Court for the Northern District of New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,698
Luevaro v. Texas State Bar et al
as 9:2023cv01376
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevaro
Respondent:
Texas State Bar and Texas Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vanderhorst v. Titus
as 9:2023cv01339
Plaintiff:
Jah-Lah Vanderhorst
Respondent:
Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moorer v. Uhler
as 9:2023cv01292
Petitioner:
DeVonte Moorer
Respondent:
Donald Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. New York State Sentence and Commitment Paper et al
as 9:2023cv01286
Petitioner:
Gary H. Moore
Respondent:
New York State Sentence and Commitment Paper, New York State Appellate Division, Fourth Department Docket #OP2200929 and Judge Murad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gunn v. Bennett
as 9:2023cv01268
Petitioner:
Darrell Gunn
Respondent:
Stacie Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bemiss v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv01249
Petitioner:
Daniel Bemiss
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paul v. Shelly
as 9:2023cv01240
Petitioner:
Prinell Paul
Respondent:
Tobias Shelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Castro v. McCarthy
as 9:2023cv01230
Petitioner:
Joey M. Castro
Respondent:
Timothy McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv01211
Petitioner:
Gary H. Moore
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Slivienski v. Corey
as 9:2023cv01127
Petitioner:
Thomas Slivienski
Respondent:
Joseph E. Corey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
