US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,215
Lester v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03059
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Carter et al
as 5:2024ct03061
Plaintiff:
Russell Young
Defendant:
Nurse Carter, Nurse Smith, Lt. John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Greene et al
as 5:2024ct03060
Plaintiff:
Kayie Shaune Wright
Defendant:
E. Greene, S. Fraser, Sergeant Webster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cureton v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03058
Plaintiff:
Keith Cureton
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeBold v. Stocks et al
as 5:2024ct03054
Plaintiff:
Antoine A. DeBold
Defendant:
Sergeant Stocks, C/O Williams, C/O Everrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spates v. Ishee
as 5:2024ct03056
Plaintiff:
Andre Michael Spates
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ishman v. Slocumb et al
as 5:2024ct03055
Plaintiff:
Bradley W. Ishman
Defendant:
Officer Slocumb, Lieutenant Thompson, Captain Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Brammer
as 5:2024ct03051
Plaintiff:
Quashon Treyvaughn Williams
Defendant:
Officer Brammer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Brame et al
as 5:2024ct03049
Plaintiff:
Dequante Terry
Defendant:
Sheriff Curtis Brame, Chief Juanita Somerville and Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsay v. Correct Care Solution et al
as 5:2024ct03050
Plaintiff:
Edward Lindsay
Defendant:
Correct Care Solution, Paula Smith, Nurse Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
