US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 31 - 40 of 23,877
EVANS v. THROCKMORTON et al
as 1:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SCOTT EVANS
Defendant:
LARRY MICHAEL THROCKMORTON and H&M LOGGING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CRUMITIE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00360
Petitioner:
THADDEUS THEOPALIS CRUMITIE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BALDWIN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00361
Petitioner:
LA'REGINALD TREDARIUS BALDWIN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
ELLIS v. GORDER
as 1:2024cv00371
Petitioner:
KENNETH JERMAINE ELLIS
Respondent:
R. VAN GORDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TURNER v. NAPHACARE CCS et al
as 1:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
JAMES JONATHAN TURNER
Defendant:
NAPHACARE CCS, FORSYTH COUNTY JAIL and NURSE JERNEGEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCRAE v. RUSH et al
as 1:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL MCCRAE, III
Defendant:
TAMARA RUSH, WARDEN PARSON, JERNIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPRAUVE v. UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
JON C. SPRAUVE
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANILLA GAMES, INC. et al v. FUEL SMART 6 INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
BANILLA GAMES, INC. and GROVER GAMING, INC.
Defendant:
FUEL SMART 6 INC., FUEL SMART 9 INC. and FUEL SMART 13 INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
MCNEILL v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
MARCUS MCNEILL
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
