US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina

Cases filed
Cases 51 - 60 of 25,824
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00408
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Kimner v. Duke Energy Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00411
Plaintiff: Audrey L. Kimner
Defendant: Duke Energy Corporation and Lynn Good
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Walker v. McFadden et al
as 3:2024cv00406
Plaintiff: Michael V. Walker
Defendant: Garry L. McFadden and Mecklenburg County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00405
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Charles v. USA
as 1:2024cv00125
Petitioner: Roger Dale Charles, II
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Osborne v. USA
as 5:2024cv00107
Petitioner: Pamela Ladawn Councill Osborne
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Dowell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff: David Michael Dowell
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Blizard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff: Christopher Blizard
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00403
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. USA
as 3:2024cv00402
Petitioner: Rashawn Donnell Williams
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?