North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 6,054
Cain v. Osborne et al
as 5:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Acquilla Booze Cain, Jr.
Defendant:
M. Osborne and FNU Sidburry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremy Lamond Henderson Trust v. Haynes
as 3:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lamond Henderson Trust
Defendant:
Brad Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Breeden v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023ct03307
Plaintiff:
Marvin D. Breeden
Defendant:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POTTS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00947
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JEFFERSON POTTS, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
LAMBERT v. UNKNOWN OFFICIALS
as 1:2023cv00948
Plaintiff:
BRANSON LAMBERT
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimes v. Call et al
as 5:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
Dustin Michael Grimes
Defendant:
Jonathan Call, FNU Whitley, FNU Wingler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spicer v. Wilkes County North Carolina et al
as 5:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Brady Leon Spicer
Defendant:
Wilkes County North Carolina, Chris Shew, Jason Whitley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JANDREW v. ROWAN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 1:2023cv00901
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. JANDREW
Defendant:
ROWAN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, ROWAN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS, RYAN BARKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shinn v. Gofourth
as 5:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Michael Brandon Shinn
Defendant:
Sloan Gofourth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Hoffman
as 5:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Joseph Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
