North Carolina Labor Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 332
COWARD v. MAC PAPERS, INC.
as 1:2019cv00943
Plaintiff:
PETER F COWARD and PETER F. COWARD
Defendant:
MAC PAPERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Marks v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 7:2019cv00130
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Marks
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Phillips v. Alliance HealthCare Services, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00300
Plaintiff:
Marvin T. Phillips
Defendant:
Alliance Healthcare Services, Inc.
SMITH v. THE STAGE FUND, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00478
Plaintiff:
ROBBIE TYLER SMITH
Defendant:
SHERRY FRYDENLUND, DANIEL J. FRYDENLUND and THE STAGE FUND, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crisanto-Valentin et al v. Jackson's Farming Company of Autryville
as 7:2019cv00090
Defendant:
Jackson's Farming Company of Autryville and William Rodney Jackson
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Crisanto-Valentin, Rodolfo Sobrevilla-Pena, Luis Enrique Garcia-Vicencio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1322
McKenzie v. CDA, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00213
Plaintiff:
David McKenzie
Defendant:
CDA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Warner v. Rush Espresso Cafe, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00139
Defendant:
Paul McConachy and Rush Espresso Cafe, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jersey Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hughes v. DynCorp International, LLC Do not docket in this case. See case number 7:19-CV-54-BO.
as 4:2019cv00038
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hughes
Defendant:
DynCorp International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
Hughes v. DynCorp International, LLC
as 7:2019cv00054
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hughes
Defendant:
DynCorp International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
LUALLEN v. THE MOSES H. CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OPERATING CORPORATION d/b/a PENN NURSING CENTER
as 1:2018cv00975
Defendant:
THE MOSES H. CONE MEMORAL HOSPITAL OPERATING CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
LOUISE E. LUALLEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
