North Dakota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 395
Jackson v. Beauchene et al
as 3:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Roger Jerome Jackson
Defendant:
Mark A. Baeuchene, Tristan-j-Van-de-Streek, Mark A. Beauchene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. McCarthy
as 3:2021cv00224
Plaintiff:
Marquis O. King
Defendant:
Jason McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BraveBull v. FBOP et al
as 1:2021cv00221
Plaintiff:
Pamela BraveBull
Defendant:
FBOP, F.C.I. Waseca, MN, Warden M. Starr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGinnis v. North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations et al
as 1:2021cv00215
Plaintiff:
Neil Adams McGinnis
Defendant:
North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, Mr. David Krabbenhoft, Mr. Colby Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballensky v. North Dakota State et al
as 1:2021cv00212
Plaintiff:
Jerric Donald Ballensky
Defendant:
North Dakota State and North Dakota State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolter v. Federal Public Defenders Office et al
as 1:2021cv00201
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Wolter
Defendant:
Federal Public Defenders Office, Jason J. Tupman and Edward Werner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Cass County Jail, et al.
as 3:2021cv00200
Plaintiff:
Randall Lloyd Hayes
Defendant:
Cass County Jail, Deputy Petersen, Deputy Goldstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castleman v. Minot, City of et al
as 1:2021cv00198
Plaintiff:
Brent A. Castleman
Defendant:
Minot, City of, Ward, County of, North Dakota, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moran v. Grand Forks Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv00167
Plaintiff:
LaShaun Moran
Defendant:
Grand Forks Police Department, Brandon Bozlerski and Brandon Bochenski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moran v. Gorham et al
as 3:2021cv00166
Plaintiff:
LaShaun Moran
Defendant:
Rhiannon Gorham and Grand Forks District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
