US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 9,258
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Nielsen v. Seven Seventeen Credit Union, Inc. et al.
as 4:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Mandy Nielsen
Defendant:
Seven Seventeen Credit Union, Inc. and Angelo Locastro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Kemp v. Biden
as 3:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
William F. Kemp, Jr.
Defendant:
Joseph Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Peterson v. Obert et al.
as 1:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
Isaac Peterson
Defendant:
Magistrate Lisa Obert, Bailiff Jim, Priest Dominic Coletta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pippin v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
James Pippin
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
