US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 9,266
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Bailey et al.
as 5:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Smith
Defendant:
Sam Bailey, Holmes County Sheriff's Office Investigators, Jim Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gora v. Cuyahoga County Children and Family Services et al.
as 1:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Yelina Gora
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Children and Family Services, Social Worker Kirsten Schron and U.S. Attorney Northern District of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shabazz v. King
as 1:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Mayor Brandon King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ward v. Adkisson et al.
as 1:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Franklin Ward
Defendant:
SHERIFF Phil Stammitti, Shea Adkisson and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Butler v. Eddy et al.
as 3:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Benjanell Butler, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Andrew Eddy, David Caudill and Landon Kohls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00459
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Scheibe v. Wayne County et al.
as 5:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Mark Scheibe
Defendant:
Wayne County, Sue Smail, Steven Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
