Ohio Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 20,124
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Community Church of Chesterland, Ohio et al. v. Penny et al.
as 1:2024cv00642
Plaintiff:
Community Church of Chesterland, Ohio, Jess Peacock, Megan Carver and others
Defendant:
Aimenn D. Penny, Chris Uthe, Brandon Perdue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Garrett v. Yost et al
as 2:2024cv01642
Plaintiff:
Allen Dupree Garrett
Defendant:
Dave Yost, G. Gary Tyack, Rachel Ganqwer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Simmons v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv01550
Plaintiff:
Sierra Simmons
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Chase W. Rogers and Randall C. Beam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
