District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases

Prison Condition Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 2,283
SHAY v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2015cv00671
Plaintiff: KEVIN SHAY
Defendant: GILMORE, D'ALASANDRO, ZAKEN and others
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RIECO v. AURANDT et al
as 2:2015cv00657
Plaintiff: DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant: PAUL AURANDT, CLEM
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
BUXTON v. HILL et al
as 2:2015cv00646
Plaintiff: ANDY BUXTON
Defendant: OFFICER FRED HILL, OFFICER BRETT EBBITT, OFFICER STEINER
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. TODD et al
as 2:2015cv00648
Plaintiff: LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant: RANDAL B. TODD, RICHARD OLAZ, KENNETH DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv00645
Plaintiff: ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT S.C.I. GREENE, SUPERINTENDENT S.C.I. SMITHFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
NAILL v. OBAMA et al
as 3:2015cv00142
Plaintiff: BILLY RAY NAILL
Defendant: BARACK OBAMA, NATIONAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, MR. WENTZEL and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE (PENNSYLVANIA) et al
as 2:2015cv00619
Plaintiff: LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant: BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE (PENNSYLVANIA), SCI-CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHBURG v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2015cv00137
Plaintiff: EMERSON RICHBURG
Defendant: GERALD ROZUM, DANIEL GEHLMAN, J. MAZURKIEWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BOATNER v. SALEM et al
as 2:2015cv00595
Plaintiff: HARRY BOATNER, JR.
Defendant: ROBERT SALEM, CORPORAL SEELBAUGH, JASON DIMUCCHIO and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNES v. WARTZ et al
as 3:2015cv00134
Plaintiff: TONY S. BARNES
Defendant: PAM WARTZ, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., MARC MASSUCI and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.