Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 12,262
Blalock v. Corley et al
as 3:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Karel Blalock
Defendant:
Lt. Corley, Lt. K.L. Strong, Captain A. Eberling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard v. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Carl Richard
Defendant:
Superintendent Barry Smith, Wellpath Medical Co., Dr. Muhammad Naji and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Proctor v. Howard et al
as 1:2024cv00622
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Proctor
Defendant:
Dr. Jacqueline Howard, PA Taylor Talasky, CRNP Tiffany Sottile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tomlin v. Smolke et al
as 1:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Shawn Tomlin
Defendant:
Sgt. Smolke, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley v. Schuylkill County Prison
as 3:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Owen James Kelley
Defendant:
Schuylkill County Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Prime Care Employees
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
John J Richardson
Defendant:
Prime Care Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Flory et al
as 1:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Richardson
Defendant:
Nurse Flory, Nurse Mallery, Nurse Leann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valoy v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Orlando V. Valoy
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Demuro-Correll v. Haidle et al
as 3:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Michael Demuro-Correll
Defendant:
Warden Haidle and Correctional Officer Kubic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swinson v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Lydell Swinson
Defendant:
CO Smith, Unit Manager Heenan, Unit Manager Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
