Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 12,262
Cooper et al v. SCI-Muncy et al
as 3:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn M Cooper and B.L.D.C.
Defendant:
SCI-Muncy, Warden Nicholas, ADA Foose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. AMOROSO et al
as 2:2024cv01786
Plaintiff:
RESHAN SAVAGE BEY
Defendant:
AYLSSA AMOROSO, SGT. POLICE OFFICER BRYAN CARNEY, ANTHONY MICHETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACOBS v. ZAKEN
as 2:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JACOBS
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LONG v. FITZGERALD
as 2:2024cv01712
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LONG
Defendant:
RICHARD FITZGERALD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
CARL RICHARD
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH, WELLPATH MEDICAL CO., DR. MUHAMMAD NAJI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stansbury v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Kareem Stansbury
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Michael Gourley, Zachary Molsak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: TIMOTHY ROBERT MARSH
as 2:2024cv01672
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ROBERT MARSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Prime Care Medical, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUCKER v. ANTHONY et al
as 5:2024cv01667
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TUCKER
Defendant:
JUDGE JAMES T. ANTHONY, ALFRED STIRBA, EARL C. SUPPLEE, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nobblen v. Harry et al
as 4:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
William Nobblen
Defendant:
Laure Harry, Kathy Brittain, County of Philadelphia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
