US District Court for the District of Rhode Island Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,994
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Ellis v. Alvarez
as 1:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Scott Ellis
Defendant:
Jackie Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Campbell v. Fay et al
as 1:2023cv00409
Plaintiff:
Eric Campbell
Defendant:
Christopher Fay, Desiree Santilli, Micheal Lafredo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DiLeo v. Simmons University et al
as 1:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Andrew Joseph DiLeo
Defendant:
Simmons University and UHS- Fuller doing business as Arbour Fuller Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
USA v. The Washington Trust Company of Westerly
as 1:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The Washington Trust Company, of Westerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Smith v. Bristol Police Department, et al.
as 1:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Smith
Defendant:
Bristol Police Department and Police Officer Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sarkisian v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Melissa Sarkisian
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
