South Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 6,810
Woods v. Langdon
as 9:2023cv06377
Petitioner:
Cedric L. Woods
Defendant:
William Langdon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knox v. United States of America
as 0:2023cv06275
Petitioner:
Tito L. Knox and Tito Lemont Knox
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Nelson
as 8:2023cv06175
Petitioner:
Joey Lynn Clark
Respondent:
Kenneth Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
O'Neal v. Jansen
as 1:2023cv06177
Petitioner:
Timothy O'Neal
Respondent:
S. Jansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Adams v. South Carolina Dept of Corrections
as 8:2023cv06143
Petitioner:
Brandon Adams
Respondent:
South Carolina Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diago v. Warden, Kirkland Corr
as 6:2023cv06108
Petitioner:
James E Diago
Respondent:
Warden, Kirkland Corr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saenz-Quintero v. Warden N. Joseph
as 0:2023cv06105
Petitioner:
Jose Saenz-Quintero
Respondent:
Warden N. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Braveboy v. Duncan
as 8:2023cv06104
Petitioner:
Abram D Braveboy
Respondent:
Steven Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunn v. Janson
as 6:2023cv06080
Petitioner:
George Washington Dunn
Respondent:
Sean Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James v. Sumter County
as 1:2023cv06046
Petitioner:
Isiah James, Jr
Respondent:
Sumter County and Director SC Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
