District of South Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases

Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 2,980
Cox v. United States
as 8:2015cv02039
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jackson v. King et al
as 4:2015cv02082
Taylor v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv02050
Plaintiff: Bobbie Taylor
Defendant: South Carolina Department of Corrections , Charles Goodson , Jack Valpey and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Beckley v. United States, The
as 2:2015cv02056
Plaintiff: Darrell Beckley
Defendant: United States, The
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Lunsford v. Bailey
as 9:2015cv02040
Plaintiff: Michael A Lunsford
Defendant: Rebecca Bailey
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Hyman et al v. Berkeley County et al
as 2:2015cv02029
Plaintiff: Julia Hyman , J.H
Defendant: Berkeley County, Berkeley County Sheriff's Department, Whitesville Rural Fire Department and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Ryant v. Bamberg et al
as 5:2015cv02035
Plaintiff: Lymisha Ryant
Defendant: Willie Bamberg, Edward Rawls, Roy Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Oxendine v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2015cv02007
Plaintiff: Annie Oxendine
Defendant: South Carolina Department of Corrections , Willie L Eagleton , Bryan P Stirling and others
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal
Vaughn v. Abbeville County et al
as 8:2015cv01993
Plaintiff: Earnest E Vaughn, Sr
Defendant: Abbeville County, Abbeville County Sheriff, Ryan Abernathy and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Newkirk et al v. Orangeburg County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2015cv01992
Plaintiff: Corey Newkirk , Jessica Newkirk
Defendant: Orangeburg County Sheriff's Office, Orangeburg County, Ronda H Bamberg and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.