District Court Cases in Texas
Cases 91 - 100 of 440,936
Booth v. Miller et al
as 4:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Booth
Defendant:
Brantley Miller and Michael Ganatos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Jerry Wayne Hamilton
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hurley v. TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00155
Petitioner:
Freddy Hurley
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. LifeScan, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Cellspin Soft, Inc.
Defendant:
LifeScan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ADASA Inc. v. SML Group Limited et al
as 4:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
ADASA Inc.
Defendant:
SML Group Limited, SML Intelligent Inventory Solutions LLC and SML (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Authentixx LLC v. Bank of America Corporation
as 2:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Authentixx LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Iron Bird LLC v. Yuneec International Co. Ltd
as 2:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Iron Bird LLC
Defendant:
Yuneec International Co. Ltd
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Livingston v. Load One, LLC
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Erika Livingston
Defendant:
Load One, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Gary v. Ackley et al
as 6:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Tondre Gary
Defendant:
Dr. John Ackley, PA-C Dylan Redding, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Hillcrest and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
