US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 6,450
Delgado v. Neely
as 2:2023cv00484
Petitioner:
Virginia M. Bourdet Delgado
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Maldonado v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00486
Petitioner:
Osman Giovanni Acosta Maldonado
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pharr v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00483
Petitioner:
Derrick Antonio Pharr
Respondent:
Harold Clarke and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Higgs v. White
as 2:2023cv00485
Petitioner:
Desmond Darryl Higgs
Respondent:
Rick White
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gazich v. State of South Carolina, Greenville County
as 3:2023cv00614
Petitioner:
Michael Gazich
Respondent:
State of South Carolina, Greenville County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Booker v. USA
as 3:2023cv00613
Petitioner:
Sylvester R. Booker
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Kankam v. Dotson
as 1:2023cv01313
Petitioner:
Daniel Yaw Kankam
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Punturi et al
as 1:2023cv01312
Petitioner:
Adrian Oneil Robinson
Respondent:
Kevin Punturi and K. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McNeely v. Unknown
as 2:2023cv00477
Petitioner:
William J. McNeely
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goode v. Clarke
as 1:2023cv01274
Petitioner:
Nasir K. Goode
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
