US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 6,445
Petion v. Clarke
as 1:2023cv01468
Petitioner:
Berry Petion
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Leu
as 2:2023cv00525
Petitioner:
Richard Allen Patterson
Respondent:
David Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harris v. Leu
as 2:2023cv00526
Petitioner:
Derrick Lamont Harris
Respondent:
David Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Butts v. Clarke
as 1:2023cv01396
Petitioner:
Corey Lee Butts
Respondent:
Harold W Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reza v. Jospeh
as 1:2023cv01390
Petitioner:
Venancio Reza
Respondent:
M. Jospeh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wilson v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00506
Petitioner:
Christopher E. Wilson
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maxey v. New Kent Circuit Court et al
as 1:2023cv01389
Petitioner:
Robert S. Maxey, Jr.
Respondent:
New Kent Circuit Court and VA D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stoner v. Warden, FCI Petersburg Medium
as 3:2023cv00643
Petitioner:
Shane Edward Stoner
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Petersburg Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hawley v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00498
Petitioner:
Garry Hawley
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newkirk v. Director of Dept. Corrections
as 3:2023cv00636
Petitioner:
Kenneth Newkirk
Respondent:
Director of Dept. Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
