US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 6,453
Houssounoukpe v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 1:2023cv01812
Petitioner:
Komlanvi Houssounoukpe
Respondent:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Strand v. Aderson
as 2:2023cv00688
Petitioner:
Evron T. Strand
Respondent:
D. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Unknown
as 2:2023cv00676
Petitioner:
Irvin E. Coleman and Lord Divine Allah
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. Dotson
as 1:2023cv01754
Petitioner:
Nathan Davis
Respondent:
Chadick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Witcher v. Punturi
as 3:2023cv00862
Petitioner:
Corinthain S. Witcher
Respondent:
Kevin Punturi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. Holcomb
as 2:2023cv00667
Petitioner:
William Gibson
Respondent:
Sheriff Rocky Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Redmon v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00841
Petitioner:
John H. Redmon
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniels v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00836
Petitioner:
Charncey Laquinn Daniels
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Najacque v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00835
Petitioner:
Leonard Wista Najacque
Defendant:
David Anderson, II
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kennedy v. Dept. of Corrections
as 2:2023cv00635
Petitioner:
Carl Ray Kennedy
Respondent:
Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
