US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Cases 161 - 170 of 68,817
Hunt v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Floyd O. Hunt, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartels et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 4:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Vernon Bartels and Sharon Bartels
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Dickie v. Mortimer
as 3:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Julie S. Dickie
Defendant:
Lawrence P. Mortimer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Ganti v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al.
as 1:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Lakshminarayana Ve Ganti
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Ur M. Jaddou and Terri Robinson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Keeton v. Dudley et al
as 3:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Brooke Keeton
Defendant:
James Roane Dudley, Angela Epps, Brendan Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
