District Court Cases in Wisconsin
Cases 121 - 130 of 46,268
Buck, Randy v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Randy Buck
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Hauke, Joseph v. State of Wisconsin
as 3:2024cv00233
Petitioner:
Joseph J. Hauke
Defendant:
Gregory A. Parker, Mathew Kolell, Chris Madle and others
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mecum, Michael v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Michael Mecum
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ferguson v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00432
Petitioner:
Grover C Ferguson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jones v. Imperial Supplies LLC
as 1:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Brittany Jones
Defendant:
Imperial Supplies LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mayberry v. Wolter Inc
as 2:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Cody Mayberry
Defendant:
Wolter Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
MoveIn Inc v. Hello Data Inc
as 2:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
MoveIn Inc dba Rentable
Defendant:
Hello Data Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Divelbiss, Randin v. Wollin, Sam et al
as 3:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Randin Divelbiss
Defendant:
Chief Sam Wollin, Officer Smith and Adams Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Divelbiss, Randin v. McFarland
as 3:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Randin Divelbiss
Defendant:
Deputy McFarland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
