Cases 1 - 10 of 5,233
Boudreau v. State of Rhode Island
as 24-1470
Petitioner:
JASON D. BOUDREAU
Respondent:
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND
DeBritto v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2024cv00201
Petitioner:
Timothy DeBritto
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island and R.I. Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BATES v. HANCOX
as 1:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
FOSTER BATES
Respondent:
JAMES HANCOX
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beatty v. Kennedy
as 1:2024cv11284
Petitioner:
Joseph W Beatty
Respondent:
Stephen Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE: JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
as 1:2024cv11274
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Donnell Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shine v. NH, State of
as 1:2023cv00547
Petitioner:
William Shine
Respondent:
NH, State of
Other:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leavitt v. FCI Berlin
as 1:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Joshua Leavitt
Respondent:
FCI Berlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Leavitt v. FCI Berlin
as 1:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Joshua Leavitt
Respondent:
FCI Berlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Borker v. Warden Bowers
as 1:2024cv11254
Petitioner:
Vitaly Borker
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Miles v. Bowers
as 1:2024cv11243
Petitioner:
Arthur Miles
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
