Cases 21 - 30 of 244,773
Rodriguez v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rodriguez
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya, GCCF Staff and New Mexico State Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, The v. South Kansas and Oklahoma Railroad, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, The
Defendant:
South Kansas and Oklahoma Railroad, L.L.C. and Centennial Energy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Merrill v. BNSF Railway Company
as 6:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Terry J. Merrill
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Steinaway v. BNSF Railway Company
as 5:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Scot A Steinaway
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Davis v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00486
Petitioner:
DeMaurea Davis
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Wright
as 5:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Smith
Defendant:
FNU Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowman v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Amber B. Bowman
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
Bowman v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 2:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Amber B. Bowman
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
Brunner v. Utah County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Donald Earl Brunner
Defendant:
Utah County Sheriff's Office and Mike Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flemons (PS) v. Republican National Party Asheville Caucas
as 1:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
Joanna Flemons
Defendant:
Republican National Party Asheville Caucas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
