Cases 41 - 50 of 163,496
Wingfield v. Phams
as 1:2024cv02221
Petitioner:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Respondent:
Angela Phams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Junco v. Georgia Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv02219
Plaintiff:
Douglas Junco
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wingfield v. Clegg et al
as 1:2024cv02220
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Defendant:
Thomas Scott Clegg, Jeffrey Mann and Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Ward et al
as 1:2024cv02193
Plaintiff:
William R. Jackson
Defendant:
WARDEN Timothy C. Ward, Kim Patton-Johnson and Stephanie Damiels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Diversitech Corporation
as 1:2024cv02214
Plaintiff:
Shantivia J. Mitchell
Defendant:
Diversitech Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Fudge v. Ken's Foods, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02215
Plaintiff:
Alvin A. Fudge
Defendant:
Ken's Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Johnson v. Sony Music Entertainment et al
as 1:2024cv02194
Plaintiff:
Sheri C. Johnson
Defendant:
Sony Music Publishing (US) LLC, Alyssa Michelle Stephens d/b/a Mulatto, StreamCut Media, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Hess v. American International Industries
as 1:2024cv02195
Respondent:
American International Industries
Petitioner:
Paul Hess and Material Analytical Services, LLC
Pinnacle Coating & Converting, Inc. v. S. Walter Packaging Corp.
as 1:2024mi00037
Plaintiff:
Pinnacle Coating & Converting, Inc.
Defendant:
S. Walter Packaging Corp.
Petitioner:
Beaver Paper and Graphic Media, Inc.
HOUSTON v. MITCHELL et al
as 5:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY MANDELA HOUSTON
Defendant:
OFFICER MITCHELL and DEPUTY WARDEN LATORSHA JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
