Cases 1 - 10 of 16,165
Zierke v. USA
as 4:2024cv03089
Petitioner:
Gary Zierke, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
WAYNE DICKS
Defendant:
City of Omaha, David Kirk, Mandee Kampbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson et al v. Flores
as 8:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Gregory Thompson, Delores Thompson and Eric Thompson
Defendant:
Anthony Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Guess et al
as 8:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Jerry D. Guess and Guess and Co. Corporation Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Dewey v. Jeffereys
as 4:2024cv03087
Petitioner:
Michael D. Dewey
Respondent:
Rob Jeffereys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leinen v. Menard, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Douglas M. Leinen
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rodriguez Izaguirre v. Meta Platforms Inc.
as 8:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Bryan Rafael Rodriguez Izaguirre
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Valentine-Williams v. City of Omaha, Nebraska
as 8:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
LaWanda J. Valentine-Williams
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Nebraska and Jane and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Watson v. Meyers
as 8:2024cv00166
Petitioner:
Marsavion Watson
Respondent:
Micheal Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
