Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 71,249
WISE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00823
Plaintiff: TIFFANY N. WISE
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
JONES v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00829
Plaintiff: KRISTIAN JONES
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BARHAM INVESTMENTS, LLC v. CITY OF CARMEL
as 1:2024cv00819
Plaintiff: BARHAM INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant: INDIANA CITY OF CARMEL
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
HEMAK v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv07102
Plaintiff: DEBRA HEMAK
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00822
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MIDDLETON v. DAVID et al
as 1:2024cv00825
Plaintiff: JASON MIDDLETON
Defendant: DAVID and MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00182
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLUE v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00181
Plaintiff: JEREMY BLUE
Defendant: INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, FRANK VANIHEL, DENNIS REGGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMSHAFT CAPITAL FUND, LP et al v. BYJU'S ALPHA, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00733
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
SAGE v. CRAWFORD et al
as 2:2024cv00179
Plaintiff: JOSHUA LOUIS SAGE
Defendant: CRAWFORD, STROSNIDER, VAUGHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?