Cases 1 - 10 of 75,290
WALTON v. MCCARTHY et al
as 2:2024cv02049
Plaintiff:
TERRELL WALTON
Defendant:
JOSEPH MCCARTHY, POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE NOS. 1-3 and POLICE SERGEANT JOHN DOE NO. 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
PATEL, M.D. v. OPTUM MEDICAL CARE OF NEW JERSEY, P.C. et al
as 3:2024cv06133
Plaintiff:
AARTI PATEL, M.D.
Defendant:
OPTUM MEDICAL CARE OF NEW JERSEY, P.C. and MAHESH TEKRIWAL, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GENELIEN v. VERIZON WIRELESS et al
as 3:2024cv06134
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO-MURLLER GENELIEN
Defendant:
VERIZON WIRELESS and HANS VESTBERG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
JNO SOLUTIONS LLC et al v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST CALDWELL
as 2:2024cv06095
Plaintiff:
JNO SOLUTIONS LLC, JONATHAN RUHNKE, ORCHID BELLEFANTIE and others
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WEST CALDWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
