Cases 11 - 20 of 53,034
Roe v. Quintessa LLC
as 5:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Tonya Roe
Defendant:
Quintessa LLC doing business as Quintessa Marketing
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Babcock v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Justin Babcock
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Small v. Johnson
as 4:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
William Oris Small, Jr
Defendant:
Allana Nicole Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Nolan v. Davis et al
as 5:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Edford Ray Nolan, Jr
Defendant:
Bradley Davis and Enid Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davison v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Gabriel Davison
Defendant:
Clifford J Smith, Scott Rowland, Robert L Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, The v. South Kansas and Oklahoma Railroad, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, The
Defendant:
South Kansas and Oklahoma Railroad, L.L.C. and Centennial Energy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Merrill v. BNSF Railway Company
as 6:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Terry J. Merrill
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Steinaway v. BNSF Railway Company
as 5:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Scot A Steinaway
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Davis v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00486
Petitioner:
DeMaurea Davis
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Wright
as 5:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Smith
Defendant:
FNU Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
