Cases 41 - 50 of 87,408
HOSKINSON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
BRANDON HOSKINSON
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BURROUGHS v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 3:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
ELLA BURROUGHS
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bettis v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Lee Bettis, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
MILLER v. O.I.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant:
LT. O.I.C., SLONG, K. FINKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Strickland et al
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Thaddeaus Jones
Respondent:
David Strickland and Baniecia Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murdock v. Ingram et al
as 3:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ajanaku Murdock
Defendant:
Kevin Ingram, FNU Williams and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Geffken v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
James Preston Geffken
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
MORRIS v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00395
Respondent:
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, N.C. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and MARY LOCKLEAR
Petitioner:
MATTHEW MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moseley v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Robert Daniel Moseley
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Lebron v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02093
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Lebron
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
