Cases 11 - 20 of 157,776
Notz v. North Florida Evaluation Treatment Center
as 5:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Arthur M Notz, III
Defendant:
North Florida Evaluation Treatment Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenel v. Harula
as 3:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kenel
Defendant:
D. W. Harula
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barfield v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Barfield
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, S. Pate, T.R. Mudd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amerson v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Amerson
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Rickey Wilcox, Andrew McFarlane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUCHIE v. HANCOCK
as 1:2024cv00087
Petitioner:
TYRONE LUCHIE
Respondent:
SHERIFF H W HANCOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LUCHIE v. HANCOCK et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
TYRONE LUCHIE
Defendant:
SHERIFF H W HANCOCK, FREDDIE HAUGABROOK, DEPUTY DREYFUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spratling v. Patterson et al
as 1:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Spratling
Defendant:
Patterson, Baird, Trent Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Small, Bruce L. v. Ruvin et al
as 1:2024cv22283
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lenoard Small
Defendant:
Harvey Ruvin and Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton, Kevin L. v. Ardon et al
as 2:2024cv14184
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamont Hamilton
Defendant:
Tony Ardon, Tyler Ludlow and Martin County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
