Cases 41 - 50 of 740,248
Lakeside Evangelical Congregational Church v. CHURCH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
Lakeside Evangelical Congregational Church
Defendant:
CHURCH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SMITH v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
ALPHEAUS SMITH
Defendant:
SAMANTHA THOMPSON and NOAH SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
SERFASS v. JAMES et al
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
JAMES SERFASS
Defendant:
CASEY JAMES, DEANNA DELLATORRED, PATRICK NAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
OWENS v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00858
Plaintiff:
ROBERT OWENS
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Santana v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC.
as 2:2024cv00862
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Santana
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Boyer v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00977
Plaintiff:
Jake A. Boyer
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Butts v. Raul Auto Sales
as 1:2024cv00979
Plaintiff:
Jody K. Butts
Defendant:
Raul Auto Sales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Morgan v. The City of Scranton et al
as 3:2024cv00978
Plaintiff:
Lee Morgan
Defendant:
The City of Scranton and Lackawanna County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Pocono Township Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00974
Plaintiff:
Allen Brown
Defendant:
Pocono Township Police Department, Office Thomas Moser, Corporal Douglas Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
