Cases 31 - 40 of 31,466
Jason Arnold v. Kevin Gillis, et al
as 24-1964
Plaintiff:
JASON P. ARNOLD
Defendant:
KEVIN GILLIS, JOSH CHRISTMAN, WILLIAM FISHER and others
Almanza v. City of DeKalb et al
as 1:2024cv04567
Plaintiff:
Veronica Almanza
Defendant:
City of DeKalb, Officer Diego Casas and Officer Betsy Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles v. The Chicago Police Department
as 1:2024cv04593
Plaintiff:
Shaun Raymond Charles and Shawn Raymond Charles
Defendant:
The Chicago Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Almanza v. City of DeKalb et al
as 3:2024cv50219
Plaintiff:
Veronica Almanza
Defendant:
City of DeKalb, Officer Diego Casas and Officer Betsy Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. City of Bloomington et al
as 1:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
Kintone Lewis
Defendant:
City of Bloomington, Hector Melchor and Matthew Summers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belford v. Anonymous Doctor et al
as 3:2024cv00456
Other:
Edward Belford
Defendant:
Anonymous Doctor, Anonymous Nurse and Anonymous Medical Organization
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RROS et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, IN et al
as 1:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
RROS and BROOKIE R. MORRISON
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, IN, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRIFFIN et al
as 1:2024cv00934
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GRIFFIN, LUCAS WALKER, THOMAS TOMLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRIFFIN v. WALKER et al
as 1:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GRIFFIN
Defendant:
LUCAS WALKER, THOMAS TOMLIN, DANNY CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reese v. Sturm
as 2:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
Thomas Reese
Defendant:
Nancy Sturm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
