Cases 41 - 50 of 3,149
Cochran v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Michael J Cochran, Sr and Michael Cochran, Sr
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Isbell v. Khan et al
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Jimmy M Isbell
Defendant:
Khan, Franciscan Health ICU and Unknown
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Goodwin v. Elkhart County et al
as 3:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Mark A Goodwin
Defendant:
Elkhart County, Derr, Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Berta
as 3:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Josiah Boyd
Defendant:
Chanda J Berta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Carlos Robinson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lenoir v Litten et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Lenior, Ms Sweets Marie and Shaquille Lenoir
Defendant:
Litten, Husin, Richard Wacasey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moorman v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Kir Moorman
Defendant:
M Hill, Fumi and Fadotrim
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Crook et al
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Reginald Darnell Porter
Defendant:
Katie Crook, Daniel Martinez, Gabe Acevedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Dart et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Corey Joseph A. Shaw
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Erin Stokes, Jacob Otto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
