Cases 41 - 50 of 325
BELL v. ROYCE
as 1:2019cv00981
Defendant:
PAUL M ROYCE and PAUL M ROYCE doing business as QUICKBOOK AGENCY.COM
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
BELL v. SUBUD GREATER SEATTLE
as 1:2019cv00945
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Defendant:
SUBUD GREATER SEATTLE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
OPPENHEIMER v. WALT EVANS DECORATORS, INC et al
as 1:2019cv00878
Plaintiff:
DAVID OPPENHEIMER
Defendant:
ETTIE L EVANS, WALT EVANS DECORATORS, INC, DAVID W. EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
BELL v. CLASSIC TOUCH LIMOUSINE SERVICE INC
as 1:2019cv00803
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Defendant:
CLASSIC TOUCH LIMOUSINE SERVICE INC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV et al v. EIGHTH WONDER et al
as 1:2018cv04002
Defendant:
EIGHTH WONDER and JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
SREAM, INC. and ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV et al v. SAT KARTAR K INC. et al
as 1:2018cv03963
Defendant:
SAT KARTAR K, INC. D/B/A CONOCO, JASWINDER SINGH and SAT KARTAR K INC.
Plaintiff:
SREAM, INC. and ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV et al v. RICK & BUD'S, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv03958
Plaintiff:
SREAM, INC. and ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV
Defendant:
RICKIE S. CLARK and RICK & BUD'S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV et al v. GET CONNECTED, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv03955
Defendant:
MOHAMMED ALBARED and GET CONNECTED, INC.
Plaintiff:
SREAM, INC. and ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV et al v. BADESHA BROTHERS INC et al
as 1:2018cv03953
Plaintiff:
SREAM, INC. and ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV
Defendant:
BADESHA BROTHERS INC and MAKHAN BADESHA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV et al v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2018cv03931
Defendant:
ROCIO TAYLOR and OBADIAH'S SOUTH, LLC
Plaintiff:
SREAM, INC. and ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
