Cases 1 - 10 of 506
Shortymacknifisent v. Fogarty
as 0:2024cv01426
Plaintiff:
Archbishop Kingpimp Shortymacknifisent
Defendant:
Kate M. Fogarty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson-Greenwood v. Restoration Hardware, Inc.
as 0:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Mia Wilson-Greenwood
Defendant:
Restoration Hardware, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Moss v. Ouyang et al
as 0:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Dale Moss
Defendant:
Grace Ouyang and Curi MMIC Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Mosby et al v. State of MN
as 0:2023cv03604
Plaintiff:
Alexisus Jarmon Mosby and D. Elise Bergeron
Defendant:
State of MN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sinkfield v. Quasi Corporation of America, Etc, The
as 0:2023cv03551
Plaintiff:
Deon Sinkfield, Jr
Defendant:
Quasi Corporation of America, Etc, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 0:2023cv03244
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Montgomery Police Department, Steven Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Awaijane et al v. Bittell et al
as 0:2023cv02892
Plaintiff:
Assad Awaijane, Robert Awaijane, Anisse Campbell and others
Defendant:
Andrew Bittell, Michael Osbeck, Jr., Christopher Cushenbery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
