Cases 31 - 40 of 77,221
Lloyd et al v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY,MD et al
as 8:2024cv01686
Plaintiff:
Samantha Lloyd and Douglas Lloyd
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY,MD, Director Corenne D Labbe, Acting Director Gregory K Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Shoemaker v. Goosehead Insurance
as 8:2024cv01684
Plaintiff:
Cody Shoemaker
Defendant:
Goosehead Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Barmer v. Pentow
as 1:2024cv01693
Plaintiff:
David A. Barmer
Defendant:
Alexander Pentow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery County, MD v. Banerjee
as 8:2024cv01685
Plaintiff:
Montgomery County, MD
Defendant:
Mithun Banerjee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company v. Hanover Armory, LLC
as 1:2024cv01664
Plaintiff:
The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company
Defendant:
Hanover Armory, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
