Cases 31 - 40 of 881,142
Ruiz v. United State of America
as 8:2024cv01343
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Ruiz
Defendant:
United State of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Morales v. General Motors LLC
as 3:2024cv03330
Plaintiff:
Mauricio Morales
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00962
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0101 Ethics in Government Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Givins v. D&C Foods, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Chiquitarose Givins
Defendant:
D&C Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hook v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2024cv22120
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Hook
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation d/b/a Carnival Cruise Lines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Betancourt v. Sanchez et al
as 1:2024cv22121
Plaintiff:
Melanie Betancourt
Defendant:
Officer Victor Sanchez, Sergeant Javier Pineda, Officer Alberto Rafael, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Beiring v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04573
Plaintiff:
Sara Beiring
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA, Products, Inc., SoftSheen Carson LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ewing et al v. Byrd et al
as 3:2024cv50213
Plaintiff:
Javion Ewing and Jazariah Lyles
Defendant:
David Byrd, City of DeKalb, DeKalb County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
