Cases 111 - 120 of 94,188
La Jolla Pharma, LLC v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00951
Plaintiff:
La Jolla Pharma, LLC
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Ndjado Hyambe Ya Shako v. Wagner
as 1:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
Jean Raphael Ndjado Hyambe Ya Shako
Defendant:
Michael Brett Wagner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SALOMON & LUDWIN, LLC v. WINTERS et al
as 3:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
SALOMON & LUDWIN, LLC
Defendant:
JEREMIAH WINTERS, CATHERINE ATWOOD, JENNIFER THOMPSON and others
Pope v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00357
Petitioner:
Jered C. Pope
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. White et al
as 7:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Alucious Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Rick White, Major King, Nurse Practitioner Jesse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graman et al v. City of Suffolk, Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Megan Kelly Graman, Laura Ashley Callis, Alissa Kiera Etters and others
Defendant:
Suffolk, Alfred S. Chandler and Casey Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Everlake Assurance Company v. Piro et al
as 1:2024cv00546
Plaintiff:
Everlake Assurance Company
Defendant:
Abigail Piro and Ernest Piro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Martin v. SAP/SAPNS2
as 1:2024cv00882
Plaintiff:
Folake Martin
Defendant:
SAP/SAPNS2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Lane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Hassie Ann Lane
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
