Cases 51 - 60 of 82
Roy v. USA
as 1:2008cv00519
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roy v. US Government et al
as 2:2008cv01626
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant:
US Government and John Does
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Roy v. United States of America
as 1:2008mc00554
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant:
United States of America
Roy v. USA
as 8:2008cv01075
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roy v. Federal Election Commission et al
as 1:2008cv00448
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant:
Federal Election Commission, Homeland Security Dept., US General and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Roy v. USA Govt et al
as 1:2008cv00424
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant:
USA Govt, U.N.O., John McCain and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roy et al v. UNO et al
as 1:2008cv00415
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy, Association Formed in 2007 - 2008 as Conglomerate of 4000+ Unincorporated, Jungle Democracies and others
Defendant:
UNO, USA, USA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roy v. Government of Kenya et al
as 1:2008cv00401
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant:
Government of Kenya, Government of Panama and Government of State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kamal Roy, et al v. Non Hostile Evidentiary Defend, et al
as 08-16702
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL KARNA ROY
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATION FORMED IN 2007 AS CONGLOMERATE OF INDEPENDENT 1000 UNINCORPORATED SMALL AND POORLY FINANCED DISADVANTAGED PEOPLE
Defendant - Appellee:
NON HOSTILE EVIDENTIARY DEFENDANT, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SUPER DELEGATES and others
Roy v. Yahoo Inc et al
as 4:2008cv02345
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant:
Yahoo Inc, Wikipedia, All News Media & News Business Conglomerates in USA and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
