Cases 51 - 60 of 95,505
Spann v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Jihad Ahmad Spann
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bynum v. Woods
as 4:2024cv00688
Petitioner:
Darryl R. Bynum
Respondent:
Ryan Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Monderen v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kenneth Monderen, Sr.
Defendant:
William Stange, Latonia Young-Griffin, Timothy Seabaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brotherhood of Railway Signalmen v. BNSF Railway, Inc.
as 3:2024cv05021
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
Defendant:
BNSF Railway, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Keys v. Busey Bank Headquarters
as 4:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
Busey Bank Headquarters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mills v. Precythe et al
as 4:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Desmond Arnez Mills
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Richard Adams, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Missouri Eastern Correctional Center et al
as 4:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
Marcus Sanders
Defendant:
Missouri Eastern Correctional Center, Sgt. Unknown Herron, Sgt. Unknown Wiggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keys v. Presbyterian Children's Home and Services et al
as 4:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
Presbyterian Children's Home and Services and Laurencia Ford Stikes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
