Cases 71 - 80 of 43,585
Valentin-Martinez v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00979
Plaintiff:
Juany Valentin-Martinez
Defendant:
Martin, Moore, Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RMK Merrill Stevens LLC v. Monaco
as 3:2024mc00063
Plaintiff:
RMK Merrill Stevens LLC
Defendant:
Anthony Monaco
Bailey v. Riehl et al
as 3:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
Jaquan Marquise Bailey
Defendant:
Joseph Riehl, Kevin Bowerman, Robert Fazzino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dunn v. Bellucci-Maus et al
as 3:2024cv00974
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dunn
Defendant:
Kerriann Bellucci-Maus, Cynthia Cartier, Stephanie Brettman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
500, LLC v. Sompo America Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00973
Plaintiff:
500, LLC
Defendant:
Sompo America Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Cole et al v. Domino's Pizza LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
Courtney Cole and Lauren Cole
Defendant:
Domino's Pizza LLC, Domino's Pizza Master Issuer LLC and Domino's Pizza Franchising LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Harris v. Treadwell et al
as 3:2024cv00968
Plaintiff:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Defendant:
Marc T. Treadwell, Charles H. Weigle, Sonja Profit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Lawson v. Maldonado
as 3:2024cv00972
Petitioner:
Jeremy Michael Lawson
Respondent:
Jeanette Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hinton v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00975
Plaintiff:
Jordan Hinton
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Daniel Dougherty, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
