Cases 1 - 10 of 42
MOORE v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES et al
as 5:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
VIVIAN D MOORE
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, APALACHEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PELLETIER v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
ROLAND PELLETIER
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and ARAMARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOBSON v. ARAMARK
as 5:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
KEEVIS R DOBSON
Defendant:
ARAMARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRIBBLE v. SECURUS et al
as 1:2023cv00032
Defendant:
ROBERT TRIBBLE, SECURUS doing business as JPAY doing business as UNITY TABLE GROUP, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. ARAMARK
as 3:2022cv22212
Plaintiff:
TYLER ROBERT SCOTT
Defendant:
ARA MARK and ARAMARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. HALL et al
as 3:2022cv07427
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE THOMAS
Defendant:
LESLIE HALL and ARAMARK SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHIS v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERV LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MATHIS
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERV LLC and LEON COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY KITCHEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
GARY JOHNSON
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES LLC and LEON COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PYLES v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERV LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PYLES and ANTHONY EUGENE PYLES
Defendant:
LEON COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERV LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00529
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
